How Many Animals Have Died Because Of Animal Testing

• This post may comprise affiliate links which - at no cost to you lot - may generate a modest fee for us if you lot buy the production. We research, review and examination a lot of products and this doesn't affect our impartiality. Invariably the money goes back on products and improving Red Orange Peach.

• 100's of millions of animal tests are performed each year
• China and the Us are the worst proponents of animal testing
• The Eu has had a cosmetic testing ban in place since 2013

Animal Testing Facts and Statistics Overview

The number of animals used in unnecessary, roughshod testing continues to be extraordinary.

Whilst the exact figures are difficult to come up past – understandable when yous consider the negative PR countries and companies know they'll receive – information technology's important to us that we shed a light on industries that continue to profit from such vile practices.

Particularly ones like cosmetics – vanity industries where in that location's absolutely no need to test whatever product on animals. That's why we shine a light on so many wonderful cruelty-complimentary companies – that we've tested, trust and thoroughly recommend.

Top 11 Most Frightening Beast Testing Facts and Statistics

one. Information technology is estimated that the Usa performs well over 100 million tests on brute each year

Because America's Animal Welfare Deed (AWA) doesn't include the animals that are primarily used for testing – rats, mice and fish – the figures are wildly underestimated. The latest figures accounted for 780,070 tests.Whereas the number is more than probable effectually the 115 million mark.

2. Merely over xx% of the world'south countries have cosmetic national testing bans in identify

41 countries take completely banned cosmetic testing on animals –this includes all of the EU– whilst some other 17 are working on it.

three. Animal testing in Australia increased by 148% between 2015 – 2017

Whilst Australia has recently implemented a national cosmetic testing ban, Queensland recorded over 12 million tests on domestic fowl in 2017 without a specified purpose.

You can find out more nearly animal testing in Commonwealth of australia hither.

4. More 90% of compounds tested on animals fail to enter the market

More recent studies estimate animal testing has a 96% failure charge per unit every bit it'southward predictability has reduced.

5. Some beast tests have years to complete and toll multiple millions of dollars

Rodent cancer studies are peculiarly expensive and time-consuming. They can cost $2 – 4 million per two-species lifetime study.

half dozen. There are 50 validated and – in part – accepted alternatives to brute testing

Typically alternatives to creature testing are incredibly effective at reducing the number of animals used equally they're more than cost and time-efficient. In some cases they tin be 97% more price effective (run across rat 24 calendar month bioassay vs Syrian hamster embryo (SHE) prison cell transformation examination).

7. The USA spend almost $20 billion of taxpayers money every year on animate being testing

47% of the NIH's upkeep for all testing projects in the USA is spent on funding animal testing.

8. 84,100 animals died in the UK in 2019 as a result of animal testing

nine. Almost 700,000 animals died across the EU in 2017 equally a result of animal testing

Of the ten,664,752 procedures performed on animals beyond the Eu in 2017, six.four% were not-recoverable and a further ten.7% (ane.fourteen one thousand thousand) were classes as'astringent.'

10. 100% of HIV vaccines that passed beast tests failed in humans

Of the almost 100 HIV vaccines that passed animal tests, none of them proved successful in human trials.

Afterwards HIV vaccine gp120 failed in clinical trials, a BMJ article distinguished how the important differences between NHPs (non-human primates) and humans had led researchers downwards a doomed path.

11. 79% of people say they would switch if they found out a make tested products on animals

Yet however brands continue to go down this route – Source: BUAV Poll

How Many Animals are Tested on each year Globally?

Ultimately 100'due south of millions of animals are tested on each year.

The worst proponents of animal testing are China, The USA, Australia and Japan. Significantly. Information technology is likely these four countries make upwardly over 50% of all tests on animals across the world.

Number of Animal Tests Performed past Country

The nine Countries that perform the almost Tests on Animals each year

Land	Number of Animal Tests per Year
USA**	100 – 120 million
Communist china*	24 million
Australia***	20 million
Japan	18 one thousand thousand
Canada	iii.8 one thousand thousand
South Korea	3.7 million
UK	iii.4 meg
Deutschland	2.eight million
France	ane.9 million
(Eu	10.nine million)

*China is notoriously difficult to gather animal testing statistics from as it's quite a closed volume. Notwithstanding we took data from Cruelty Free International and practical a xx% increment – an increase in line with the residue of the countries on our list (excluding the United kingdom of great britain and northern ireland)
**The Usa is equally difficult to extrapolate accurate animal testing data. According to the US Government statistics, but 780,070 animals were used in tests – a 5.7% increase from 2017. But as the U.s. has no ban in identify, these statistics practise not include all animals. Most mice, rats, and fish are not covered past the Animal Welfare Act – though they are notwithstanding covered by other regulations that protect animal welfare. So the broad ranging figure of  up to 120 million is a best approximate for the number of animals used in US laboratories.
***Australian animal testing has exploded in recent years. This has been driven by the use of 12 million domestic fowl in Queensland in 2017. The total number of animals used in 2017 (20.2 one thousand thousand) jumped from 12 million in 2016. Alarming figures to say the least.

How Many Countries Have Fauna Testing Bans in Place?

There are xl Countries with National Corrective Testing Bans in place every bit of 2021. Which is twenty.five% of the world's nations.

Then there are a further 17 countries working on implementing bans – another 8.7%. What complicates the upshot are countries like Brazil and The Usa where there are partial bans in place. And we mean partial.

In Brazil, only vi of the 26 states have approved a ban for cosmetic animal testing. And the USA is fifty-fifty worse. In America, only five states have banned cosmetic animal testing.

Countries like Canada still don't have any bans on corrective animal testing.

Animal Testing Statistics in the Britain

Testing cosmetic products and their ingredients on animals was banned in the UK in 1998 every bit part of European union Regulation 1223/2009 (cosmetics regulation).

The ban was created because non-animate being methods were developed to test the rubber of the cosmetics AND vanity products cannot be classed in the same bracket as testing on legitimate medical products.

Y'all can read more than about the UK's creature testing policy here.

Run into how theEuropean Cosmetics Directivedefines a cosmetic or vanity product:

---

"Whatsoever substance or preparation intended to be placed in contact with the various external parts of the man body (epidermis, pilus arrangement, nails, lips and external genital organs) or with the teeth and the mucous membranes of the oral crenel with a view exclusively or mainly to cleaning them, perfuming them, changing their appearance and/or correcting body odours and/or protecting them or keeping them in good condition."

— European Cosmetics Directive

---

4 Major Beast Testing Facts and Statistics in the Uk

Every year the UK government publishes a study on the scientific procedures that occur on living animals.

This gives the states the opportunity to analyse the current land of play in our own country and to come across how creature testing has developed over the years.

1. iii,400,000 Procedures on animals in 2019
2. 86% of the animals were mice, fish and rats
3. 16,100 Personal licenses handed out to test on animals
4. 84,100 Animals died as a upshot

Now, there are three licences required by the Animals (Scientific Procedures) Deed 1986 before testing on animals is immune. The 3 licences needed are:

1. A personal licence for each person carrying out procedures on animals
2. A project licence for the programme of work
3. An establishment licence for the place at which the work is carried out

So whilst the number of tests are reducing slowly beyond the UK, the number of applications forpersonal licenses is, at best, concerning.

Brute Testing Facts and Statistics in The Eu

• The UK runs the most tests on animals in the Eu, followed by France and Germany
• six.4% of all animal tests were non-recoverable – the subject died
• In 2017 there were over 10 million tests on animals in the EU

Since 2013 the EU has implemented a ban on cosmetic animate being testing.

However at that place are nevertheless millions of animals born specifically for testing each yr and – betwixt 2013 and 2017 – the number of authorised projects has increased past 176%.

And during this timeframe, the number ofinspections – announced or unannounced – barely increased at all. As 70% of adults in Eu countries hold that replacing beast testing with non-animate being methods should be an EU priority, we will proceed to

4 Animal Testing Statistics in the European union

1. 10,664,752 Procedures on animals in 2017
2. 92% of the animals were mice, fish and rats
3. six.4% of all tests performed were non-recoverable
4. 10.vii% of all tests performed were classed as 'severe'

What Animals were used for Animate being Tests in the EU

In 2017, the main species used (for the first time) in enquiry and testing in the EU were: mice, fish, rats and birds.

Which together represented 92% of the total number of animals while species of particular public business organization (dogs, cats and non-homo primates) represented less than 0.3% of the full number of animals. The same amount every bit amphibians, cephalopods and reptiles.

Merely equally the number of animal tests beyond the EU has increased by 16% betwixt 2017 – 2020, we tin can apply the same increase to get estimates (admitting accurate estimates) for how many animals were used for the first time in 2020:

• Mice: 6.6 meg
• Fish: ane.4 meg
• Rats: i.28 1000000
• Birds: 0.64 million

Animal Testing Facts and Statistics in The USA

• The USA arguably has the worst and least transparent fauna testing policy
• The Animal Welfare Act (AWA) doesn't cover mice, rats or fish – the most widely used animals in inquiry
• Estimates put the number of animals used in animal testing at well over 100 million per year

1. 99% of animals involved in tests aren't included in the Animal Welfare Deed
2. $nineteen.6 billion spent by the NIH on animal research and testing in 2020
3. 90% of animals aren't included in official statistics
4. vii% of animals weren't given whatsoever pain relief

In 2019, US government statistics put the number of laboratory animals used in inquiry at 797,546, an increment of 2.ii% from 2018.

However, because these statistics do not include mice, rats, and fish- animals not covered by the Brute Welfare Act – they are wildly inaccurate. Estimates merits that the number of mice and rats alone is 111.5 million.

We take a more detailed breakdown on animal testing in the USA here.

Public Perception Statistics of Fauna Testing

Americans…
Who oppose animal testing for scientific purposes
52%

Source: Pew Research

If a brand tested on animals…
79% Of people would switch

Source: BUAV Poll

In the UK…
38% Believe that cosmetic testing is legal

Source: Department for Energy, Concern & Industrial Strategy – Public Attitudes to Animal Research

65% of the British Public can accept animal testing for medical research…
IF there's no alternative

Source: Section for Energy, Concern & Industrial Strategy – Public Attitudes to Animal Research

Those who believe that corrective testing on animals is permitted in the Britain are just as likely as the residual of the public to say they tin accept the use of animals in medical inquiry. This context-driven nature of support for beast research needs to exist well-documented.

If we're all more than aware of societal laws and in particular the ample number of alternatives to animal testing, nosotros can motion towards a kinder world that no longer supports animal testing in any forms.

What % of Animal Tests are fifty-fifty 'Successful?'

• A test could last up to 2 years and at that place could be two,000 animals involved
• More than 90% of compounds inbound clinical trials fail to gain regulatory approval
• Testing a single active pesticide ingredient takes a decade, costs approximately $71,000,000 and kills up to eight,000 animals to complete all of the fauna studies required to annals one single pesticide

For drug testing lone the average fourth dimension to bring a product to market is 10-fifteen years.

With a current failure rate of 90% – 55% due to a lack of efficacy and 28% due to the toxic effects in humans – the demand for more efficient, sustainable technologies in hazard assessment over current paradigms is so blatant it's hard to cover how such barbarian processes are kept alive.

What does the Future concord for Beast Testing?

It's not all doom and gloom. There are some initiatives designed to reduce the number of animals involved in testing around the world.

The Time to come of Animate being Testing in The Us

EPA has moved abroad from requiring the testing of potentially harmful chemicals on animals. A decision that hasn't gone downward well with numerous research groups and environmentalists.

The Due east.P.A. Administrator Andrew Wheeler said the bureau plans to reduce the amount of studies that involve mammal testing past 30 percent past 2025, and to eliminate the studies entirely by 2035.

---

"We are really excited as this has been something nosotros've wanted for quite some time…The alternatives are the futurity. They're more efficient and save lives.."

— Kitty Block, President of the Humane Society of the USA

---

The Future of Animal Testing in China

Even Red china, a country lambasted for it's approach to animate being testing, is looking at loosening steps regarding corrective testing on animals.

In July 2020 Cathay'due south National Medical Products Administration (NMPA) began formulating new restrictions that are believed to lift the animal testing requirement. 1 that requires any cosmetic sold in the country to be tested on animals.

Information technology's the reason why companies that sell in China cannever be labelled equally cruelty-gratis. And why nosotros'd never trust brands who trade their humane responsibility for some quick yen.

Whilst it's unclear exactly what is likely to happen, nosotros'll accept whatsoever progress we can regarding People's republic of china'due south fauna testing policies.

The Future of Animal Testing in The EU

So whilst testing cosmetics on animals has been banned in the Great britain since 1998 and the EU ban on fauna tested cosmetic products was showtime passed in 1993 – with the full ban taking result in 2013 – there are still millions of animal tests that occur each year.

10.nine 1000000 to be exact!

But co-ordinate to data provided past Cruelty Gratis Europe, lxx% of adults in European union countries agree that replacing brute testing with non-animal methods should be an EU priority. With such strong public backing, we're confident that whatsoever non-essential animal testing volition shortly be made illegal across all European union states.

Additional Sources

The Canadian Council on Animal Intendance

Recherche Animale Inquiry Statistics

Humane Society International – S Korea

Laboratory Animal Statistics in Germany

Source: https://redorangepeach.com/animal-cruelty/statistics/

Posted by: higginshavem1951.blogspot.com

Share this post